Pratap Ramrao Nimbalkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

(1) 916 CA 13081.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13081 OF 2024 IN WP/6662/2024 PRATAP RAMRAO NIMBALKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Mr. S.N. Pagare, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent/State.

...

CORAM :

S.G. MEHARE & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATED :

6 DECEMBER 2024 ORDER:- .

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. The applicant has removed the office objection before the impugned order was passed. However, there appears some defects in the efiling process. Hence, the application is allowed. The writ petition be restored to its original position, by condoning the delay.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME) (S.G. MEHARE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde