Vimalbai Gulabrao Nirval v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
(1) 932 CA-6255.2018 + 3.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6255 OF 2018 IN FAST/37270/2017 VIMALBAI GULABRAO NIRVAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND 933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6259 OF 2018 IN FAST/36266/2017 PRAYAGBAI RANGRAO NIRVAL (DIED) THROUGH LRS GULAB AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS AND 934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6260 OF 2018 IN FAST/36281/2017 PRABHAKAR GULABRAO NIRVAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS AND 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6261 OF 2018 IN FAST/36259/2017 GANPATRAO RANGRAO NIRVAL (DIED) THROUGH LRS PRAHLAD GANPATRAO NIRVAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...
Smt. Pratibha Bharad, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. P.N. Kutti and Mr. A.A. Jagatkar AGPs in respective applications for the State.
Ms. Suvarna Zaware, Mr. S.R. Erande, Mr. S.V. Mundhe and Ms. Pranoti Karpe, Advocates for Acquiring Body in respective applications.
...
(2) 932 CA-6255.2018 + 3.odt CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED :
14.09.2022.
ORDER:- 1.
Heard the rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay as mentioned in their applications, which has been caused due to their poor fnancial condition. The learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel for the Acquiring Body in respective applications strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay. 2.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the respective delay period as mentioned in the applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods. 3.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. 4.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde