Chintaman Govinda Patil v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Minor Irrigation Jalgaon And ORS

- 1 - ca6187.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6187 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 35789 OF 2019 WITH FRIST APPEAL ST. NO. 35789 OF 2019 Chintaman Govinda Patil .. Applicant

Versus

The Special Land Acquisition Officer & others .. Respondents Mr. I. K. Wagh, Advocate holding for Mr. K. G. More, Advocate for the applicants.

Mr. S. V. Hange, AGP for the State.

Mr. B. K. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 2. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 12th JANUARY, 2024.

PER COURT :

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 564 days in preferring first appeal.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2/acquiring body. 3.

It is the contention of claimant/applicant that due to financial difficulties, the appeal for enhancement of compensation could not be filed in time.

- 2 - ca6187.22.odt 4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, delay caused in filing the appeal be condoned. The said contention is strongly opposed by learned AGP as well as learned counsel for the acquiring body. 5.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, no malafides can be attributed to the applicant for not preferring the appeal in time. It is clarified that applicant/claimant would not be entitled to interest on amount for the aforesaid period if he succeeds in the appeal. In view of this, delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Appeal be registered.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb