Pravin Hanumant Thite v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp14099.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 14099 OF 2019 Pravin Hanumant Thite Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. R.S.Banik, advocate for petitioner.

Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 3. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & AVINASH G. GHAROTE,J J.

DATE : 21st November, 2019 PER COURT:

Instant petition is not only misconceived but is fled with mala fde intention. Petitioner is the son of respondent No.

4. Petitioner is making grievance that respondent No. 4 shown wrong date of birth in his service record.

The petitioner is unconcerned with the employment of respondent No. 4 with respondents No. 2 and 3. The petitioner does not have any locus to fle such petition. Writ petition is dismissed with cost.

AVINASH G. GHAROTE S.V.GANGAPURWALA JUDGE JUDGE adb