Venkat Pandhari Dahiphale And Another v. The Union Of India And Others

13648.17wp (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.13648 OF 2017 1.

Venkat s/o Pandhari Dahiphale, Age: 30 years, Occu: Private Service, R/o: Dahiphale Nivas, Lectur Colony, Ahmedpur, Tq. Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur 2.

Padmakar s/o Mohanrao Hanmante, Age: 31 years, Occu: Private Service, R/o: Kingaon, Tq. Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur ..PETITIONERS

VERSUS

1.

The Union of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development and Ministry of Skill Development and Enterpreneurship Director General of Training, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi 2.

Regional Director of Training Regional Central Apprenticeship Advisor Board of Apprenticeship Training, Western Region, Mumbai 3.

Assistant Director of Training, Trade Test Board of Apprenticeship Training, Western Region, Mumbai 4.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

Through it's Executive Engineer, MSEDCL Divisional Office, Latur ..RESPONDENTS Mr C. D. Biradar, Advocate holding for Mr U. P. Giri, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr D. G. Nagode, A. S. G. I. for respondent Nos.1 to 3; Mr A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.4

13648.17wp (2) CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.

DATE : 19th September, 2018 ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

Considering the prayers made in the petition, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners fairly admits that the petition has been rendered infructuous during the passage of time, as such, the petition requires to be disposed of as infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous.

(MANISH PITALE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) sjk