Pramodini Sachin Toranmal v. Sachin Bhaskar Toranmal

2025:BHC-AUG:8511 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 5 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 355 OF 2024 PRAMODINI SACHIN TORANMAL ....Applicant

VERSUS

SACHIN BHASKAR TORANMAL .....Respondent Mr. Chetan Barku Chaudhari, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Vishnu Khanke, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 19th MARCH, 2025 P. C.

1.

Heard the parties for sometime.

2.

This application is by the wife seeking transfer of the proceeding bearing Petition A No. 230 of 2024 from the court of learned Family Court at Aurangabad to learned Family Court, Solapur.

3.

It is the case of the wife that distance between two

(2) cities is more than 350 km. She has also filed divorce proceeding bearing Petition No.100/2024.

4.

Considering that the proceeding which is sought to be transferred is for restitution of conjugal rights, in the interest of both the parties that divorce proceeding and the present proceeding are tried at the same court to avoid conflicting the judgment, hence the following order.

ORDER

(i) The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause-C.

(ii) After the proceeding is transferred, the learned District Court shall try to dispose of the proceeding as early as possible and preferably within one year from the date of transfer.

(iii) The learned District Court shall give suitable

(3) dates considering the dates given in other proceedings, if any.

(iv) The respondent is at liberty to request the concerned Court for appearing through video conference.

(v) The applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments and shall co-operate in speedy disposal of the case.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] VishalK/5mca355.24