The State Of Maharashtra v. Dhiraj Bhagwan Chaudhari And ANR

2025:BHC-AUG:9948 937-appln-3822-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3822 OF 2019 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

DHIRAJ BHAGWAN CHAUDHARI AND ANR ....

Mr. R. D. Raut, APP for the Applicant-State Mr. Mangesh S. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE : 03.04.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

This is an Application for condonation of 29 days delay in preferring the Appeal against the acquittal recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in Spl. A.C.B. Case No.15/2015 by Judgment and order dated 29.06.2019. 2.

Pursuant to the notice issued to the Respondents, the learned Advocate Mr. Patil appears for Respondent No.2. None appears for Respondent No.1, though the name of learned Advocate Mr. Dhananjay B. Thoke is shown for Respondent No.1. The learned APP appears for the Applicant-State. 3.

Heard.

4.

Perused the Application. For the reasons mentioned in the Application in Paragraph Nos.2, 3 & 4, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

[ NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] HRJadhav