Dnyaneshwar Srikisan Naikwade. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

6821.15crapln -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6821 OF 2015 Dnyaneshwar s/o Shrikisan Naikwade ...Applicant versus 1.

The State of Maharashtra 2.

Anjali Shriram Dhengale

...Respondents

.....

Mr. N. L. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant Mr. M. B. Bharaswadkar, A.P.P. for respondent/State .....

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 21st JANUARY, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

This is an application for cancellation of bail granted to non-applicant No. 2 Anjali, one of the accused in Crime No. 158/2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 504 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code by Additional Sessions Judge, Beed vide order dated 01/12/2015. 2.

Mr. N. L. Jadhav, learned Counsel for the applicant submits that, pursuant to the complaint, an offence in question came to be registered against non-applicant No. 2 as she has participated in the attack on his mother. According to him, since the mother has

6821.15crapln -2expired because of multiple injuries, non-applicant No. 2 ought not to have been released on pre-arrest bail.

3.

Perused the order granting pre-arrest bail and cause of death cited in the post mortem report. In view of the observations that death of mother of the complainant has caused because of pneumonia with septicemia, as is reflected in P. M. report, in my opinion, pre-arrest bail granted by the learned Sessions Judge does not call for any interference. As such, application fails, same stands rejected.

[ N.W. SAMBRE, J. ] Tupe/21.01.2016