Nawal Vijay Baviskar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:991

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN.NO.2101 OF 2024 NAWAL VIJAY BAVISKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.R.V.Gore APP for Respondent-State : Mr.V.M.Chate ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 14.01.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 1107/2024, registered at S.B. Police Station, Jalna, District Jalna, for the offences punishable under sections 64, 69 and 71 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court, by order dated 17.12.2024, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicant for the reasons stated in the said order and in terms of the said order, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated with the investigation. It is observed in the said

order the applicant had sexual relationship with the girl on the pretext of marriage and it cannot said that the applicant never intended to marry with the victim. Discussion was going on between the family members as regards the marriage between the parties.

4] Considering that in terms of order dated 17.12.2024, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated with the investigation. In view of the same, interim protection granted by order dated 17.12.2024, stands confirmed, in the following terms : i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required by the investigating officer.

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

5] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

6] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

7] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC