← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/374/2023application allowed

Sheetal Santosh Luniya v. Santosh Vijaykumar Luniya

2024-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker1 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:8815

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 954 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 374 OF 2023 Sheetal Santosh Luniya

VERSUS

Santosh Vijaykumar Luniya ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.S. Bedre Advocate for Respondents : Mr. D.S. Ingale ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : April 25, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave of this Court to correct the prayer clause as the proceeding before the lower court is pending before learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sinner. Leave is granted.

2.

The learned counsel for the respondent has filed reply and has not opposed the present application filed for transfer of the petition. In view of the same, the MCA is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. 3.

On such transfer being made, the concerned Trial Court to decide the proceedings as expeditiously as possible.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/