Uttam Mareppa Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

CA.14747-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14747 OF 2018 IN PIL/75/2018 UTTAM MAREPPA GAIKWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. A.H.Kasliwal, Advocate for Petitioner Mrs G.L.Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State ...

CORAM :

PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

07.12.2018 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard Mr. Kasliwal, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant / petitioner. The submission is that certain information could not be received by the applicant at the time of filing of the petition but subsequently the applicant / petitioner, by taking recourse to the remedies under the Right to Information Act, could get certain information and yet notice is not issued to the respondents. The applicant / petitioner be permitted to place on record the information received by the applicant / petitioner. This material is certain orders from the Government offices. As such, no prejudice would cause to the respondent / authorities.

CA.14747-18.odt 2.

Considering the submissions of Mr. Kasliwal, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Necessary amendment be carried out by Tuesday i.e. on 11.12.2018. (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) ...

vmk/-