← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13701/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Gajanan Gunwantrao Yadnyekar And Another v. The Additional Collector Jalna And Others

2018-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh2 pages

13701WP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13701 OF 2017 Gajanan s/o Gunwantrao Yadnyekar and another ...Petitioners

Versus

The Additional Collector, Jalna and others

...Respondents

...

Mr. Aniruddha A. Nimbalkar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. S. N. Kendre, Assistant Government Pleader for respondents no. 1 and 2.

Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for respondent no. 3. ...

[CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] Date: 28 th September, 2018 ORDER :

1.

Learned counsel for petitioners refers to that the purpose underlying petition, in view of subsequent developments, has been rendered infructuous. He, therefore, seeks continuation of protection granted by this court for a period of 15 days in order to enable him to approach the revisional authority.

2.

In the circumstances, petition is disposed of as infructuous.

13701WP.odt 3.

Protection to petitioners continue for a period of fortnight. However, it is made clear that, the protection is extended only for aforesaid limited period and would be no indication on merits of the matter. Revisional authority would pass orders uninfluenced by the order of this court. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] vdk