Nilesh Shivram Patil v. Jaisingh Chaunesing Rajput

CA-16194.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16194 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL [STAMP] NO. 37501 OF 2016 Nilesh Shivram Patil .. Applicant vs Jaisingh Chaunsing Rajput .. Respondent --- Mr. Mohanish V. Thorat, Advocate for applicant Mr. V. B. Patil, Advocate for respondent CORAM :

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

24th February, 2017 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

Applicant draws attention to the various difficulties before lodging appeal.

3.

Learned counsel for respondent purports to resist, however, is not in a position to overcome the veracity of the reasons given by adducing any credible material.

4.

In the circumstances, it would be expedient to condone delay which does not appear to be inordinate.

5.

As such, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause (A) and is disposed of.

SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE pnd