Padmakar Bhojraj Chaudhari v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2.16ra -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 02 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10712 OF 2012 Padmakar Bhojraj Chaudhari, R/o. Mhaiswadi, Tal. Yawal, Dist. Jalgaon.

...Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. Girish Nagori, Advocate for applicant Ms. R.P. Gour, A.P.P. for respondents/State .....

CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 10th JUNE, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

Respondent No.5 though served, none appears.

2.

In view of law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale vs. Navnath Tukaram Kakde and others reported in 2014(6) Mh.L.J. 804 holding that the requirement under Rule 17 of the Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 in the matter of proposing and seconding of motion since held to be directory, the judgment dated 04/12/2015 passed in Writ Petition No. 11678 of 2015 is hereby set aside. Writ Petition No. 11678 of 2015 stands restored to the file and be placed

2.16ra -2before the Court assigned with the Writ Petitions as per present roster for further consideration.

3.

Review Application stands allowed in above terms. [ N.W. SAMBRE, J. ] Tupe/10.06.16