← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5265/2020delay condonatedrejected

Suresh Baddu Rathod v. Bhausaheb Vaijinath Nile And ORS

2023-02-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 972 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5265 OF 2020 IN FAST/36266/2019 SURESH BADDU RATHOD

VERSUS

BHAUSAHEB VAIJINATH NILE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chillarge Subhash S. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 28.02.2023 PER COURT :

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. The learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 despite appearance remained absent whereas respondent No. 3 despite service also remained absent. The applicant is claiming condonation of delay of only 30 days. Since ther is no oppose to the application, the delay of 30 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

2.

The appeal is placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-