← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/726/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Sakubai Harising Chandela v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2017-03-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.L. Wadane3 pages

1 wp 722.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2017 Girijabai Ramji Mirase Died through L.Rs. Bharat Ramji Mirase and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 723 OF 2017 Limbaji Honaji Mirase Died through L.Rs. Sopan Limbaji Mirase and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 724 OF 2017 Ganpatsing Govindsing Gahirwal .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 725 OF 2017 Vitthal Raghoji Zhurale Died through L.Rs. Raghiji Vithal Zurale and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 726 OF 2017 Sakubai Harising Chandela .. Petitioner

2 wp 722.17

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 727 OF 2017 Kishan Budhaji Malode .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 728 OF 2017 Gangabai Shivling Gudup .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1189 OF 2017 Babruwan Shankar Yedge and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Gajanan Sontakke, Advocate for Petitioners in all matters. Shri V. M. Kagane, A.G.P. for Respondents/State in all matters. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 03RD MARCH, 2017.

PER COURT :

.

Mr. Sontakke, the learned counsel submits that, the petitioners have filed applications seeking rental compensation. The applications are filed with the respondent No. 1, so also the

3 wp 722.17 acquiring body, but the said amount is not yet paid. 2.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader states that, the applications are not filed with the respondent No. 2. 3.

The applications, it appears that, are filed with the acquiring body and the respondent No. 1/Collector for payment of rental compensation. The petitioners may file applications with the respondent No. 2 seeking rental compensation. On receipt of said applications, the respondent No. 2 shall take decision upon the same on its own merits, in accordance with law after hearing all parties concerned, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of applications. The writ petitions accordingly are disposed of. No costs. [ K. L. WADANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/March 17