Bombay High CourtWP/12404/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Pundlik Visvanath Ghorpade v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-02-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora2 pages

12404.15wp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 12404 OF 2015 PUNDLIK VISVANATH GHORPADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shaikh Rameez Raja Sk Maqsood AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.B. Yawalkar.

Advocate for Respondents 3 & 4: Mr.Tope Sambhaji S. ...

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.

Dated: FEBRUARY 15, 2016 ...

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has retired as Gram Vistar Aadhikari from Zilla Parishad Service within the period from 1.1.2006 to 27.2.2009. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Division bench of this Court in case of Smt. Savitribai Narsayya Guddapa vs The State of Maharashtra and others (Writ Petition No.8985 of 2011 with connected petitions) vide judgment dated 9th May, 2014 has held that, even those employees who have retired in between 01.01.2006 to 27.02.2009 will also have benefit of the Government Resolution dated 30th October, 2009 for payment of revised pension under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules.

12404.15wp The respondents / State will be at liberty to verify the factual assertions made in the petition from the record maintained by the respondents/State.

In the light of that, the writ petition is disposed of. The respondents / State shall consider the case of the petitioner for payment of revised pension as per the Government Resolution dated 30th October, 2009. The petitioner shall submit representation to that effect with the respondents/State and the respondents/State shall consider the said representation within a period of three months of its receipt and if found eligible as per the judgment of this Court, shall pay the same expeditiously. No costs. (P.R. BORA, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/