Rauf Shaikh Karim Kakar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:625

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN.NO. 2111 OF 2024 RAUF SHAIKH KARIM KAKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Adv.Sabahat T. Kazi a/w. Adv.Vanita H. Sangale APP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 09.01.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 231/2023, registered at Dondaicha Police Station, District Dhule, for the offences punishable under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 136 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

3] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court, by order dated 11.12.2024, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicant for the reasons stated in the said order. Thereafter, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated

with the investigation. Nothing is recovered from the applicant. No further evidence is discovered connecting the applicant in the alleged crime.

4] Considering that in terms of interim order dated 11.12.2024, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated with the investigation. In view of the same, the interim order dated 11.12.2024 stands confirmed, in the following terms :

i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required by the investigating officer.

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

5] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

6] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

7] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC