← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/2110/2024disposed off

Monu @ Harshdip Anand Ghodeshwar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025-01-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:2393 1 946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 946 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2110 OF 2024 MONU @ HARSHDIP ANAND GHODESHWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant :

Ms. Pratiksha S. Magre h/f. Mr. Magre Sunil G. APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Sonpawale ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2025 PER COURT:

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2.

The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.236/2024, dated 02.11.2024, registered at City Police Station, Bhusawal, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Sections 117, 118(1), 3(5), 351(2), 352 of B.N.S., 2023. 3.

This court by interim order dated 10.01.2025 granted interim protection to the applicant.

4.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the fight has occurred on the spur of the moment and that no corresponding injury caused to the informant at the instance of the applicant. He further

2 946 submits that the applicant has attended the police station and cooperated with the investigation. 5.

In view of the above, the interim protection granted by order dated 10.01.2025 stands confirmed, on the following terms: i] The applicant shall attend the police station as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case. iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court. 6.

In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled. 7.

It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove. 8.

The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe