Sunil Jangalu Mali v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:34186-DB 1 964 appln 4213-25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4213 OF 2025 IN APEALST/11662/2025 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4424 OF 2025 IN APEALST/12311/2025 SITARAM APPA TALWARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Mr. P. S. Patil, APP for Respondent-State ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATED : 05/12/2025.

P. C. :

1.

It appears that despite the absence of the applicants, we had issued notice to the respondents on the last occasion in both the applications. Today also, the applicants and their advocate remain absent. However, since both the applications pertain to condonation of delay in filing appeals against the order of conviction, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay as prayed in both these applications. Accordingly, both the applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).

2.

The appeals be registered after removal of office objections, if any.

( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-