Gangadhar Wamanrao Kadam v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.12571 OF 2016 Gangadhar s/o. Wamanrao Kadam, Age : 46 years, Occ. Agri., r/o. At post Jintur, Tq. Jintur, Dist. Parbhani ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Co-operation, Marketing and Textile Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and ors.

..Respondents -- Mr.M.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner Mr.S.B.Joshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4 -- CORAM : V.M. KANADE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 06, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.12.2016 passed by respondent no.3 - District Deputy Registrar (Co-operative Societies). By the said order, respondent no.3 has

given sanction to fill-up three posts of Junior Clerks.

3.

The contention of the petitioner is that the sanction order is contrary to the enquiry report and Government Resolution dated 28.08.2014. 4.

In our view, the objection of the petitioner is without substance. We have perused the impugned order. The impugned order, in terms mentions that the decision to fill-up three posts shall be subject to certain conditions, which are mentioned below the said sanction. Condition no.2 in terms states that while filling-up the said posts, relevant Government Resolutions/Circulars, which have been issued from time to time, shall be followed. It is obvious that if the impugned sanction order is contrary to certain report, Government Resolutions and circulars, then the sanction would remain on paper only.

5.

In view of above, we do not propose to entertain the petition. The petition is premature. The petition stands dismissed. [SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [V.M. KANADE, J.] kbp