Ahemadi Begum Shaikh Maheboob v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.28 OF 2019 AHEMADI BEGUM SHAIKH MAHEBOOB

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr.Yogesh K. Bobade Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr.S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Mr.H.P. Jadhav Advocate for Resp. No. 3.

...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

DATE : 1st FEBRUARY, 2021 ORDER :

1.

Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 purports to state that the request to decide representation referred to in writ petition may not be necessary in view of the decision dated 25th March 2019 which, according to learned counsel for respondent No. 3, is in respect of the request made under representations referred to in the writ petition.

2.

In view of the same, writ petition is disposed of without undermining resort to remedial measures as would be possible under law by the petitioner.

[ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] asb/FEB21