Bombay High CourtWP/113/2017rejected at admission stage

Chaya Raju Magare v. The Union Of India And Others

2017-08-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane1 pages

{1} wp113.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 113 OF 2017 Chaya Raju Magare Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India & others Respondents Mr. P.S. Pawar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents-State. Mr. D.G. Nagode, advocate for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. D.K. Thote, advocate for respondents 6 and 7. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2017 PER COURT:

Petitioner does not have any constitutional, legal or other right to claim loan or financial benefits. In exercise of extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, no interference is called for in the petition. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected.

( S.M. GAVHANE ) ( R.M.BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb