← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/4132/2023application allowed

Pranay Sanjay Jagtap And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2023-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

11 APPLN.4132.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

11 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4132 OF 2023

1) Pranay Sanjay Jagtap.

2) Shila Sanjay Jagtap.

3) Trushali Sandeep Jagtap.

4) Shrushti Sandeep Jagtap.

5) Shreya Sandeep Jagtap.

... Applicants

Versus

1) The State of Maharashtra.

2) Shraddha Pranay Jagtap.

... Respondents ...

Mr. Mahesh Kalidas Bhosale, Advocate for Applicants. Ms. K. R. Jamdade, APP for Respondent/State.

Mr. Santosh Nagorao Pawde, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ...

CORAM :

R. G. AVACHAT and SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE :

28th November, 2023.

Order: (Per Sanjay A. Deshmukh, J.) .

Issue notice to the respondents. The learned APP waives notice for respondent No.1 / State. Mr. S. N. Pawde, learned counsel waives notice for respondent No.2.

The parties have settled their dispute. The applicants and the informant are residing under one room. They have filed a deed of settlement-cum-affidavit, which is marked as "Exhibit X-1" for identification.

11 APPLN.4132.2023.odt Considering the fact that the matter has been compromised, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] nga