← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/13976/2024disposed off

Snehal Sahebrao Rautwar And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2025-02-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:3575-DB This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // 1 NOB.WP-13976-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 13976 OF 2024 SNEHAL SAHEBRAO RAUTWAR AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Yogesh B. Bolkar Addl.GP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.S. Shinde ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 12th FEBRUARY 2025 PER COURT :

1.

Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

2. This motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 29.01.2025.

3. It is contended that the order was pronounced on 03.02.2025, but wrongly 29.01.2025 is quoted on the first page of the order. There are two petitioners, but in paragraph no.6 at line nos. 9, 12 and 13, singular petitioner is quoted. Similarly in operative part nos. (iii) and (iv) of the order, only petitioner is quoted instead of petitioners.

4. We find that inadvertently wrong date is mentioned on the first

This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // 2 NOB.WP-13976-2024.doc page of the order as well as instead of plural, singular petitioner is mentioned in paragraph no.6 and in the operative part of the order. The motion is innocuous and needs correction.

5. Accordingly the date of pronouncement mentioned on the first page of the order be corrected as '03.02.2025'. In paragraph no.6 at line nos. 9, 12 and 13 as well as in the operative part nos. (iii) and (iv) of the order, the word 'petitioner' be substituted with word 'petitioners'.

6. Necessary corrections be carried out in the order and corrected order be uploaded.

7. Motion is disposed of.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ S. G. MEHARE, J.] NAJEEB..