Chandrakant Tukaram Shinde v. The Chairman, Maharashtra Gramin Bank Nanded And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16493 OF 2016 IN WP/3576/2013 CHANDRAKANT TUKARAM SHINDE

VERSUS

THE CHAIRMAN, MAHARASHTRA GRAMIN BANK & ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Shri Joshi Sujeet D Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri Ashpak Taher Patel ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Dated: January 06, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court, on 29.7.2015 and 29.9.2015 in Writ Petition No.3576 of 2013 and Civil Application No.12175 of 2015, the CGIT-Cum-Labour Court, Mumbai-1 was directed to register the case of the applicant and to adjudicate upon the said reference.

2.

The applicant is before this Court stating that since the position of Presiding Officer, CGIT-Cum-Labour Court, Mumbai-1 is vacant and CGITCum-Labour Court, Mumbai-2 is available, the matter, which has been time bound by this Court, be transmitted to the available CGIT-CumLabour Court, Mumbai-2. 3.

Learned Advocate for the respondent Bank is seeking an adjournment. I am refusing the adjournment since an innocuous prayer akl/d

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 - CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16493 OF 2016 has been put forth by the applicant and which cannot be said to be an unusual request.

4.

In the light of the above, this application is disposed off by permitting the applicant to move an application before the CGIT-CumLabour Court, Mumbai-2 for taking up the proceeding No. CGIT-1 of 2015. Since the applicant is above 57 years old and since no loss or harm or prejudice would be caused to the respondents, I am granting the liberty as above to the applicant. Needless to state the learned CGIT-CumLabour Court, Mumbai-2 shall ensure that the respondent Bank is duly informed about the proceedings being taken up by the said Court. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...

akl/d