Pandhrinath Ganpat Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1634 OF 2015 (Pandharinath Ganpat Rathod Vs. The State of Maharashtra) ---- Mr. Suvidh S. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.R. Borulkar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State ---- CORAM :

S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 21st October, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

On perusal of the FIR, we prima facie find that the ingredients of the offences alleged against the petitioner have been disclosed in the FIR.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was present in the school and there was no question of his presence at the place of incident. This plea can be taken by way of defence in the trial Court and not before this Court. No case is made out for quashing the FIR. In the circumstances, the criminal writ petition stands rejected.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE npj/criwp1634-2015