← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5341/2022admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Kachru Punjaba Gaikwad (Died) Thr Lrs Anusayabai And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2024-08-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:19887 933-938 -CA-3826-22 (+)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3826 OF 2022 IN FAST/32462/2019 Laxman Dagdu Gaikwad (died) Through L.Rs. Karbhari (died) Through L.Rs. Hirabai Karbhari Gaikwad And Others

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ......

Mr. Abhishek M Hajare, Advocate for Applicants Mr. A.A.A. Khan, AGP for Respondent - State ......

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5235 OF 2022 IN FAST/41000/2019 Raghunath Dagdu Nile

VERSUS

The Collector Aurangabad And Others ......

Mr. Abhishek M Hajare, Advocate for Applicant Mr. R.B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondents - State ......

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5341 OF 2022 IN FAST/36749/2019 Kachru Punjaba Gaikwad (died) Through L.Rs.Anusayabai And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ......

Mr. Abhishek M Hajare, Advocate for Applicants Mr. R.D. Raut, AGP for Respondents - State ......

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5387 OF 2022 IN FAST/36746/2019 Pundlik Thamaji Gaikwad

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ......

Mr. Abhishek M Hajare, Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.B. Bhange, AGP for Respondent - State ......

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6080 OF 2022 IN FAST/33751/2019 S.P. Rane

933-938 -CA-3826-22 (+) Rangnath Shankar Gaikwad

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ......

Mr. Abhishek M Hajare, Advocate for Applicant Mr. D.B. Bhange , AGP for Respondent - State ......

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6088 OF 2022 IN FAST/33746/2019 Shankar Balwanta Gaikwad

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ......

Mr. Abhishek M Hajare, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A.A.A. Khan, AGP for Respondent - State ......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 30th AUGUST, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Heard.

2.

These are the applications filed by applicants/claimants for condonation of delay in filing the first appeals.

3.

Learned AGP for respondent-State strenuously opposed to condoned the delay stating that delay is not properly explained.

4.

For the reasons stated in the applications, applications are allowed. Delay condoned.

5.

Applicants-claimants shall not be entitled to claim interest for the period of delay.

6.

Appeals be registered.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE S.P. Rane