The Gmidc Aurangabad Thr The Exe Engineer, Lower Dudhana Project Div., Selu And Others v. Muktabai Ganpatrao Borade
-:(1):- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1121 OF 2016 IN FAST/37964/2015 THE GMIDC AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT DIV., SELU AND O
VERSUS
MUKTABAI GANPATRAO BORADE ...
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1125 OF 2016 IN FAST/37955/2015 THE GMIDC AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT DIV., SELU AND O
VERSUS
SUDAM BAPURAO TANPURE *** WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1128 OF 2016 IN FAST/37943/2015 THE GMIDC AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT DIV., SELU AND O
VERSUS
BHAGWAN SHESHERAO MOTE *** CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1134 OF 2016 IN FAST/37937/2015 THE GMIDC AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT DIV., SELU AND O
VERSUS
PUNJARAM BHIMRAO BORADE *** WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2142 OF 2016 IN FAST/369/2016
-:(2):- THE GMIDC SINCHAN BHAWAN, AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT
VERSUS
TUKARAM BHIMRAO BORADE *** CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2214 OF 2016 IN FAST/37971/2015 THE GMIDC AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT DIV., SELU AND O
VERSUS
SAMPATRAO SHANKARRAO WAGH *** WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2217 OF 2016 IN FAST/37949/2015 THE GMIDC AURANGABAD THR THE EXE ENGINEER, LOWER DUDHANA PROJECT DIV., SELU AND O
VERSUS
GULAB LAXMAN MHASKE ...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Tandale P. R.
*** CORAM: T. V. NALAWADE, J.
DATED:
24th FEBRUARY, 2016.
PER COURT:
1.
All these applications are filed for condonation of delay. Heard learned counsel for the Applicants. 2.
In view of the contents of the applications and the submissions made, that some time was consumed for collecting certified copies, some time was consumed for processing the matters and some time was consumed for getting sanctions at various levels, this Court holds that sufficient cause is shown.
-:(3):- 3.
In the result, delay is condoned. All the applications are allowed and disposed of accordingly.
[T. V. NALAWADE, J.] Dt.24/02/2016.
ans/1121