← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/67/2025application allowed

Sudhir Murlidhar Borkar v. Bapusaheb Baban Kadu Deseased Thru. Lrs. Chhaya Bapusaheb Kadu And Others

2025-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar1 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:208 ca 67.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2025 IN CRA/12/2020 Sudhir Murlidhar Borkar

VERSUS

Bapusaheb Baban Kadu Deseased Thru. Lrs. Chhaya Bapusaheb Kadu And Others ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. K.V. Sarosiya h/f S.S. Bora Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Y.S. Dareek h/f A.B. Kale for 1,2, Mr. R.R. suryawanshi h/f Mr. S.R. Sapkal for respondent no.3 CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

Dated : January 06, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.

2.

Prayer is made seeking permission to bring on record L.Rs. of deceased respondent no.1 i.e. Bapusaheb Baban Kadu, who died on 22.8.2023. The application also seeks to condone delay of 388 days caused in filing the CRA.

3.

Considering submissions advanced and reasons as given in paragraph no.b,c and d of the application, delay is sufficiently explained. There would be no prejudice if prayer in the application is allowed. In that view of the matter, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause b and c and disposed off. Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) aaa- ....