Nita Manohar @ Bhausaheb Kadam And ORS v. Gorakh Manikrao Kadam And ANR

4187.19CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4187 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 37621 OF 2018 NITA MANOHAR @ BHAUSAHEB KADAM & OTHERS

VERSUS

GORAKH MANIKRAO KADAM & ANOTHER ...

Mr.R.S.Bavikh, Advocate h/f.Mr.V.P.Latange, Advocate for the applicants Mr.Rohit H. Dahat, Advocate for the respondent no.2.

Respondent no.1 served.

...

CORAM : V.L.ACHLIYA,J.

DATE : 21.01.2020 P.C.

1] The applicants have moved this application seeking condonation of 58 days delay in filing appeal for the reasons set out in detail in the application.

2] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the respondent no.2. The respondent no.1 though served absent.

3] On due consideration of the submissions advanced in the light of unchallenged and uncontroverted pleadings made in the application assigning cause for

4187.19CA.odt condonation of delay, I am of the view that delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. Delay condoned.

4] Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objection.

5] Civil Application is disposed of in above terms.

[V.L.ACHLIYA] JUDGE DDC