Shital Vinayak Mete v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 ) wp29.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.29 OF 2019 SHITAL VINAYAK METE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. S.S.Pawar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for the respondent/State. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.

DATED :

09.01.2019 P.C. :- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file fresh petition. He submitted that inadvertently certain grounds raised to seek quashment of the order passed by the Education Officer are not reflected in the petition, as the petition was hurriedly prepared.

3.

In view of the statement of the counsel, the petition is allowed to withdraw with liberty as prayed for. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn. [S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.] / .19 ssp Jan /wp29.19