Tanjaji Yashwant Pawar v. Ulhas Bhaskar Kankal And ANR

14490.2016CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14490 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 38180 OF 2015 Tanaji s/o Yeshwant Pawar ...Applicant

Versus

Ulhas s/o Bhaskar Kankal and another ...Respondents ...

Mr. Bhumkar R. P, Advocate for applicant Mr. Prashant K. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2 ...

CORAM: SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

Date: 6th January, 2017 PER COURT:

1.

Learned advocate for the applicant points out that delay is sought to be accounted for under the reasons as are appearing in civil application.

2.

Learned advocate for the respondents though purports to resist is not in a position to dispute veracity of the reasons. In the facts and circumstances, it would be expedient to condone the delay occurred in filling second

14490.2016CA.odt appeal.

3.

In view of aforesaid, civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of. (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH) JUDGE VDK