Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thr Its Manager, Aurangabad v. Sanjay Jatya Rahase And ORS

925.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 FIRST APPEAL NO.1108 OF 2019 WITH CA/457/2019 IN FA/1108/2019 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., THR ITS MANAGER, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

SANJAY JATYA RAHASE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Choudhari Abhijit G. Advocate for Respondent No. 1 & 2: Mr. D.S. Bagul.

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 05/12/2019 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides. The original claimants and the insurer which has preferred the appeal have entered into a compromise. The terms of settlement have been duly verified before the Registrar (Judicial). Those are taken on record and marked as 'X' for the purpose of identification. 2.

It is an injury claim preferred by the father for and on behalf of his son who though is major was unable to prosecute the claim petition before the Tribunal. Though the Tribunal has allowed the petition and awarded compensation, since the son as well as father have been shown to be separate petitioners in the title of the petition there was a bit of confusion. It is now clarified that the entire compensation would be received by the son. 3.

The appeal is therefore disposed of in terms of compromise ' X'

.

However, an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- shall be deposited as a fixed deposit 1/2

925.odt in the name of the original petitioner/claimant for a period of five years in any Nationalized Bank. As agreed in the settlement the amount be refunded to the appellant/Insurance Company. Refund the court-fees as per Rules. 4.

All the pending Civil Applications are disposed of. ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) mkd 2/2