← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/14549/2025disposed off

Netaji Subhashchandra Bose Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha v. The Union On India Through The Secretary And Others

2025-12-04Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:34044-DB wp-14566-2025 and wp-14549-2025 (RTE).odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.14566 OF 2025 Kai. Govind Pawar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Chakur, Tq. Chakur, District Latur, Through Trustee and Authorized Signatory Girirao Bhanudas Suryawanshi .. Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India, Through the Secretary and others .. Respondents ...

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.14549 OF 2025 Netaji Subhashchandra Bose Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Through Trustee and Authorized Signatory, Dhaneshwar Gurunath Bibrale .. Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India, Through the Secretary and others .. Respondents ...

Ms. Neha Udawant, Advocate h/f Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for the petitioners in both the petitions.

Ms. M. G. Kasturkar, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.1 in both the petitions.

Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar and Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGPs for respondents/State in respective petitions.

Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for respondent No.5 in both the petitions. ...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

DATE : 04 DECEMBER 2025 [1]

wp-14566-2025 and wp-14549-2025 (RTE).odt ORDER :

.

These are the petitions of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioner/management under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGPs waive notice for respondents/State in respective petitions. Learned Central Government Counsel Ms. M. G. Kasturkar waives notice for respondent/Union of India in both the petitions. Learned Advocate Mr. U. B. Bondar waives notice for respondent No.5/Zilla Parishad in both the petitions.

3.

We have heard both the sides.

4.

We dispose of these writ petitions by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners' proposal independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of (04) weeks from today and if the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter.

[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]