← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/14427/2023disposed off

Babasaheb Patilba Patare And Others v. Babasaheb Baban Narsale And Others

2025-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre2 pages

127wp14427.23.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 127 WRIT PETITION NO. 14427 OF 2023 BABASAHEB PATILBA PATARE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

BABASAHEB BABAN NARSALE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Shaikh Majit S. Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar Advocate for Respondent No. 8 : Mr. Shaikh Joyeb I. ...

CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.

DATE : 08.12.2025 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for respective parties. 2.

The petitioners are assailing the common order dated 09.11.2023 passed below Exh. 22 by District Judge-2, Shrirampur, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 26 of 2023 whereby, the appeal filed by the respondents came to be allowed.

3.

I have gone through the order passed by the learned appellate Court. The Appellate Court has passed following order in Clause-4 of the operative part :

"ORDER 1.

......................

2.

.......................

3.

......................

4.

The Application at Exh. 41 of the defendants restraining the plaintiffs from causing obstruction or

127wp14427.23.23 interference in using way passing through portion of their land out of Block No. 90/1 is allowed.

5.

.................

6.

..................

7.

.................."

4.

The learned Appellate Court has recorded finding in paragraph Nos. 29, 30 and 31 of the said order that the road was already in existence. It has relied upon the order dated 05.06.2023 passed by the Tahsildar, Shrirampur which was based on panchanama prepared during proceeding conducted under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906. 5.

The learned Appellate Court has prima-facie considered the proceeding during the pendency of the suit and no perversity is found in its order. Therefore, I am of the view that no interference is warranted in the order dated 09.11.2023 passed below Exh. 22 by District Judge-2, Shrirampur, in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 26 of 2023. 6.

In view thereof, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to the costs.

(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) mahajansb/