Swapnil Jaggnath Shelke And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 Writ Petition No. 298/2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION No.298 of 2019 Swapnil Jagannath Shelke and another

...Petitioners

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others ...Respondents Mr. Dhananjaya Mane, Advocate, holding for Mr. S.T. Pankhade, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar,Asstt.Govt.Pleader for respondents No.1 to 3 Mr. S.G. Kawade, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 14th January, 2019 ORDER:

1.

Heard learned counsel for petitioners.

2.

After hearing the learned counsel for petitioners, learned counsel for the caveator/respondent No.5 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents No.1 to 3, it transpires that, it is case of present petitioners that having regard to the information supplied to them and the certificate issued by the school with regard to change in the date of birth, it was not necessary to remand the matter to the collector for verification and decision afresh.

3.

On perusal of the decision of the appellate authoritythe commissioner, it appears that elaborate reasons are given

2 Writ Petition No. 298/2019 while remanding the matter. Having regard to those, it does not appear that it suffers any infirmity entailing interception under discretionary powers of this court.

4.

In view of aforesaid, writ petition is not being entertained and is rejected.

( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ) JUDGE.

Madkar