Pralhad Mahadu Gajbhar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

{1} 960-CA-2175-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2175 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 37958 OF 2018 WITH CA/2171/2020 IN FAST/37951/2018 WITH CA/2172/2020 IN FAST/37937/2018 WITH CA/2174/2020 IN FAST/37946/2018 WITH CA/2179/2020 IN FAST/37960/2018 WITH CA/2180/2020 IN FAST/37934/2018 WITH CA/2176/2020 IN FAST/37956/2018 WITH CA/2177/2020 IN FAST/37890/2018 WITH CA/2173/2020 IN FAST/37940/2018 WITH CA/2178/2020 IN FAST/37944/2018 ANKUSH NAMDEO KAKNALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. A.V. Sakolkar h/f. Mr. V.G. Sakolkar AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Mr. A.B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. S.B. Patil ....

CORAM : S.G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 29th September, 2022 ORDER :

.

Heard learned Counsel for applicants, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Counsel for respondent No.3.

2.

Considering the submissions of all the learned Counsel and reasons mentioned in the applications, Pooja K.

{2} 960-CA-2175-2020 applications are allowed. The delay of 1894 days for fling appeals is condoned.

3.

The applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefts for the delayed period and shall fle undertaking in that regard.

4.

Appeals be registered subject to removal of ofce objections, if any.

5.

The Civil applications are disposed of.

[S.G. DIGE, J.] Pooja K.