Rasheed Dastgir Sayyed v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.800 OF 2017 (Rashid Dastgir Sayyed Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) ---- Mr. M.A.Thorbole, Advocate for the petitioner Mrs.A.V.Ghondhalekar, A.G.P. for the respondent/State Mr.K.U. More, Advocate for respondent No.3 ---- CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 18th APRIL, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

Mr.K.U.More, the learned counsel for respondent No.3 states that as far as prayer clause (B) of the petition is concerned, the same is under consideration of respondent No.3 and he would take decision upon it within six weeks. The said statement is accepted. 3.

As far as prayer clause (C) of the petition is concerned, respondent No. 3 shall take decision on the representation (page 42 of the petition) on its own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within six weeks.

4.

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE npj/wp800-2017

wp800-2017