Arun Jaywant Khale/ Khatik And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:11468-DB 43 appln.4239.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

43 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4239 OF 2023 ARUN JAYWANT KHALE/ KHATIK AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Md. Samiuddin M. Y. Choudhari & Mr. Jay S. Sirsat. (Absent) APP for Respondent / State : Mr. A. D. Wange. Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Bharat N. Gadegaonkar. ...

CORAM :

SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE :

21st April, 2025.

P.C.:

.

The learned counsel for the applicants is absent when the matter is called out. The learned counsel for respondent No.4 is present. The learned counsel for applicants was also absent on 10th February, 2025. It was specifically stated that if the learned counsel for the applicants remained absent on the next date, then the application is liable to be dismissed. The matter was kept on 17th March, 2025. Unfortunately, on 17th March, 2025, the matter could not be reached. But, today also the learned counsel for the applicants is absent without assigning any reason.

Under such circumstances, we dismiss the application. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ] nga