Rajyog Bajaj, Latur Thr Its Atuhorized Person Santosh B Jagtap v. Meenakshi Rajendra Sutar And ORS

{1} CA 319 OF 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2018 IN FAST/39200/2017 RAJYOG BAJAJ, LATUR THR ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON

VERSUS

MEENAKSHI RAJENDRA SUTAR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri S. G. Chapalgaonkar Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : Shri Sushant B. Choudhari Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 & 8 : Shri M.B.Kolpe ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

Date: January 18, 2019 ...

PER COURT :- Though, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents - claimants has opposed for condoning the delay stating that the reasons as are assigned are not sufÏcient to condone the delay, for the reasons stated in the application, which according to me are just and sufÏcient, delay of 200 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned.

Civil Application No.319 of 2018 stand disposed of. Appeal be registered in accordance with law.

On registration of the appeal, Issue notice to the respondents. Shri S.B.Choudhari, learned Counsel waives notice for respondent Nos.1 to 6. Shri M.B.Kolpe, learned Counsel waives service of notice for respondent Nos.7 and 8. Service complete.

List the appeal for further consideration on 15.02.2019. Call Record and Proceedings.

( P.R. BORA, J. )