Manoj Narayan Ladde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp15148.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15148 OF 2019 Manoj s/o Narayan ladde Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Ms. Pratibha Bharad, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.K.Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents No.1 & 5. CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J J.

DATE : 17th December, 2019 PER COURT:

We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for Respondents No.1 and 5.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that without hearing the petitioner, decision is taken about the fnal bill.

The dispute is about the amount receivable by the petitioner. The amount is disputed by the respondents. The respondents, vide letter dated 03.11.2017, have communicated to the petitioner that the fnal bill has been paid and no dues are payable.

{2} wp15148.19.odt The petitioner will have to prove the disputed questions of facts. The remedy available to the petitioner would be before the Civil Court or such other forum available as per the contract between the petitioner and the respondents. In the light of above, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, as is permissible in law. In that event, all contentions are kept open. No costs. AVINASH G. GHAROTE S.V.GANGAPURWALA JUDGE JUDGE adb/