Subhash Kesharmal Barlota Thro His Power Of Attorney Mohammadd Abdul Shakeel M A Sami v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) 125-ca-14148-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14148 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7871 OF 2019 SUBHASH KESHARMAL BARLOTA ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. Aashish Manglani, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. G. L. Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State. Mr. S. G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in WP.

Mr. Indranil Godsay h/f Mr. Rajednra S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 to 9.

...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED : 02nd DECEMBER, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

Mr. Manglani, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the amendment is necessitated and is relevant for deciding the matter in issue. The applicant could lay hand on the documents after filing of the writ petition. 2.

We have also heard Mr. Godsay, learned counsel holding for Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for respondent nos.7 to 9. The learned counsel opposes the application.

(2) 125-ca-14148-2019 3.

Even otherwise the non-applicants will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of an amendment. 4.

The petition is at the nascent stage. It is not admitted.

5.

In the light of above, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (b).

6.

Civil Application is disposed of.

7.

Place the writ petition on 15.02.2020.

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE Devendra/December-19