Rajesh Jalba Sonkamble And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Dist. Collector Nanded And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:11962 28.odt (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2025 IN FAST/35189/2024 Rajesh Jalba Sonkamble And Anr

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra Through Dist. Collector Nanded And Ors ...

Advocate for Applicants : Ms. Anagha Pandit h/f Mr. K.M. Nagarkar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. D.B. Bhange ...

CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : APRIL 24, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

Heard learned advocate appearing for applicants. 2.

Applicants seek to condone delay of 875 days caused in filing appeal.

3.

Perused the reasons as stated in paragraph nos.3 to 5 of the application. Applicants could not file appeal within stipulated time due to financial difficulties. Applicants are litigating for getting just compensation towards acquired land. No malafides are discernible in making delay. In that view of the matter, case is made out to condone the delay.

4.

In result, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), subject to condition that applicants file an undertaking to the satisfaction of Registrar (Judicial) of this Court that they shall not claim interest or statutory benefits in case appeal is favourably

28.odt (2) considered and enhanced compensation is awarded. Said undertaking to be filed within a period of eight weeks from today, which shall be made part of compilation of appeal. (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Mujaheed//