Narayan Dhanaji Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 CP 736-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 736 OF 2017 Narayan Dhanaji Rathod

...Petitioner

Versus

The Sate of Maharashtra and others

...Respondents

---- Mr. S. B. Bhosale, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for the respondent No.1/State ---- CORAM : R. M. BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ.

DATE : 13-12-2017 PER COURT :

1.

On perusal of the communication dated 7th November 2016, it does not transpire that there is any violation of the direction issued by this Court. The claim of the petitioner is under consideration of the respondent and they are expected to take appropriate decision. 2.

There is no need to take cognizance of the instant contempt petition since there is no violation of any direction of this Court. The contempt petition devoid of merits, hence stands rejected. [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE vjg/-.