Mayur Subhash Shetkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

21CA9149.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9149 OF 2018 IN X-OBJST/41987/2017 IN FA/2269/2013 WITH CA/9148/2018 IN X-OBJST/39142/2016 WITH CA/9150/2018 IN X-OBJST/42048/2017 WITH CA/9151/2018 IN X-OBJST/41950/2017 WITH CA/9152/2018 IN X-OBJST/39144/2016 CHANDRASHEKAR RAMLU AYYA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S.S. Deshmukh(Patnurkar). AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.N. Morampalle. Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. L.R. Thakur h/f. Mr. S.G. Sangle.

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : .16.12.2019 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

2.

In this First Appeal filed by the acquiring body, the respondent - claimants intend to prefer X-objections but a delay has occasioned in filing these X-objections. By way of these applications, the original claimants are now seeking condonation of delay in filing the X-objections. 3.

The applicants - claimants having lost their right to property are entitled to a fair compensation determined at the hands of this Court. It cannot be allowed to be defeated for the technical reasons. The acquiring body has also preferred appeal and it would be just and proper to allow the applications.

4.

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the applications are

21CA9149.18.odt allowed. The delays are condoned subject to the condition that the claimants shall not be entitled to claim any interest for the period of delay. ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) S.P.C.