Mehtabsab S/O Maheboobsab v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through District Collector, Nanded And ORS

987-CA.1388-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1388 OF 2025 IN FAST/35284/2024 MEHTABSAB S/O MAHEBOOBSAB

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDED AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bilolikar Upendra Bapurao. AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. B. A. Shinde. ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 19.06.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard learned counsel Mr. Bilolikar for applicant and learned AGP for respondents/State. None appears for respondent No.3.

2.

Applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 638 days in preferring first appeal. He is relying on paragraph Nos.2 to 4 of the application. The grounds pressed into service by the applicant are not controverted. The applicant is ready to forego interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 3.

Civil application for delay is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" on condition that the interest and the statutory benefits for the delayed period shall stand forfeitted.

987-CA.1388-25.odt In First Appeal 4.

Admit.

5.

Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents/State.

6.

Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court.

7.

It is clarified that appellant shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-