Mahadeo Rustham Solanke And ANR v. Raju Sakharam Pisal And ANR

35.CA.1040.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 35 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1040 OF 2019 IN FAST/38687/2018 MAHADEO RUSTHAM SOLANKE

VERSUS

RAJU SAKHARAM PISAL AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Agrawal Pavankumar S. Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. M. K. Goyanka ...

CORAM

:

SUNIL. K. KOTWAL,J.

DATE :

01st April, 2019 PER COURT:

1.

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned counsel for respondent No. 2.

2.

Sufficient cause is assigned for the delay caused in filing appeal. Therefore, the delay of 56 days is condoned. Civil Application is disposed of.

3.

First Appeal (st) No.38687/2018 be registered. 4.

Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Goyanka waives service of notice for Respondent No. 2.

habeeb 1/2

35.CA.1040.19.odt 5.

Record and proceeding be called.

6.

Stand over to 25.07.2019.

(SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) habeeb 2/2