Vitthal Shripat Banbare v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

{1} ca3918.20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICTION NO. 3918 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 38124 OF 2019 Vitthal s/o Shripat Banbare Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Ms. L. R. Thakur, advocate holding for Mr. L. C. Patil, advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. P. N. Kutti, AGP for Respondents No. 1 & 2. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE J.

DATE : 24th August, 2022.

PC :

The applicant-claimant is seeking condonation of delay of 38 days caused in fling the First Appeal against the award dated 03rd July, 2019 in L. A. R. No.247 of 2012, which has been caused due to poor fnal condition.

The learned AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2 strongly opposed the application. However, Respondent No.3 - acquiring body, despite service, remained absent.

Thus, considering the reasons stated in the application, delay of 38 days stands condoned subject to the condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the period of such delay and for the delayed period in obtaining belated

{2} ca3918.20.odt circulation.

Accordingly, application stands disposed of.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb