Deelip Govindrao Mhaisekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

970.WP.15283.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 970 WRIT PETITION NO.15283 OF 2019 DR. DEELIP GOVINDRAO MHAISEKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni Mukund R. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. A.R. Kale ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 03/01/2020 PER COURT :

1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.P. are ad idem that the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner of Writ Petition No.6261/2017 with connected writ petitions decided under judgment and order dated 26.04.2019.

2.

In light of that we follow the same course.

3.

For the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 26.04.2019 in Writ Petition No.6261/2017 with connected writ petitions we direct that if the recovery has not been made by the respondents from petitioners regarding the excess amount of non-practicing allowance paid, the same shall not be made as the same would be inequitable. 4.

Writ petition accordingly disposed of.

( MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) habeeb 1/1